Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sethian (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:MUSIC. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 18:45, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sethian (band)

Sethian (band) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) Unfortunatly nothing has been added for some time. This band while being great to someone does not fall into the catagory of Very short articles providing little or no context, nor can it be considered noatable. Mystar 05:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep as the band having members from numerous notable bands, passing WP:MUSIC guidelines. Stubbiness is not a reason for deletion, fyi-K@ngie^meep! 03:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Also, here is the band's pedigree, it mentions Finntroll and Nightwish a number of times :) [1]-K@ngie^meep! 03:50, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Article fails to prove notability per the fundemental attribution policy. NeoFreak 15:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Simply because it has band members that are noatable, is not reason enough to have its own page. It does not meet criteria for WP:bandAn article that fails to even claim that the subject of the article is notable can be speedily deleted under criterion A7, as well as A mere claim of notability, even if contested, may avoid deletion under A7 and require a full Article for Deletion process to determine if the subject of the article is notable. Which is what we are doing here. Perhaps this information is better suited as a foot note on another page? Mystar 17:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The band has members from a number of notable bands. Thus it passes WP:MUSIC. You could always use the band's official bio as a source for that. Also, this, or this as a reliable source. I mean really, why don't people try to find things?-K@ngie^meep! 07:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Why does somebody else have to fix it? You are, after all, the one that wants it kept. If you want this article to not be deleted then prove notablity through attribution and I'll change my vote. NeoFreak 22:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
      • I don't have the time to spend 23 hours a day in front of the computer like your average wikipedian. I don't have much time at all really nowadays, so naturally I am not capable of sourcing, expanding and researching an article at this point in time-K@ngie^meep! 22:23, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Meets WP:MUSIC. Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable. I've expanded the article to demonstrate that the band contains 5 such members. Óðinn 19:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.