Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Score (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - brenneman 06:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Score (magazine)

Procedural nominaton from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 January 28#Score (magazine) overturn. Abstain as procedural. Daniel.Bryant 09:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Daniel.Bryant 09:33, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, I'm voting keep on the basis this article has been constantly deleted without ever being given a chance to improve. Now it has been sent straight to AfD after it passed the deletion review to allow it to exist. I believe it should be given a chance to exist and improve to a state where it could properly survive an AfD, I feel this is a justified feeling as it appears to be a magazine that has spun of numerous other magazines. Thus indicating that it is likely to be rather notabile, certainly at least one or more of those ones that have been spun off I suspect could even survive on their own thus surely the parent one ought to likewise survive. I'll wait and see. Mathmo ^Talk 10:42, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, much as we have guidelines for pornographic stars, so we should probably follow similar guidelines for paraphernalia as well. I am not convinced that this article on a non-notable magazine could ever be brought up to code following WP:RS and WP:OR.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 22:23, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Non-notable? Dozens of porn stars have been featured in this magazine, many of these for the first time in any magazine ever. --84.137.55.143 10:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Unfortunately, just because a lot of porn stars' articles link to this article doesn't mean the magazine is notable. There needs to be some kind of assertion in the Score article, backed up by third-party sources.-Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 04:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Weak delete The magazine does an (annual?) "Boob Cruise" where it gets a bunch of readers to go on a Caribbean cruise with the models for a week or two, that does make it slightly more notable than the average magazine in my opinion. Whether the cruise can be verified from third party sources is a different matter though, if it can I'll change to keep. One Night In Hackney 04:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.