Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Schulz-Prager Controversy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Enough with those damn merges that don't make sense. Johnleemk | Talk 13:40, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Schulz-Prager Controversy
This afd nomination was incomplete. The nominator's reasoning was not notable, not worthy of wikipedia. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:36, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Merge into the articles for each person. The controversy article itself has nothing to make it worthy of a separate article.
- Delete as unencyclopedic and something that's virtually certain not to be entered into a search box. Stifle 16:49, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete not worth even putting in the main entrys for the respective individuals. Brimba 17:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
