Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Shipley

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 00:07, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sarah Shipley

Blatant vanity. I'm not comfortable speedying this though, as it does make an assertion of notability (having won the 2005 "Miss Sexy Australia"). But that claim, as far as I can tell, is patently untrue. A google search turns up nothing, even when I look for variations. As such, hoax and vanity, so delete. --Dmcdevit·t 08:42, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nominator. --TheMidnighters 08:57, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. If there was a "Miss Sexy Australia" contest, every pimple-faced blogger on the net would be drooling over it. Since Google only gives 1 irrelevant hit, I say it's bogus. -- Visviva 09:02, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn vanity -Harmil 11:53, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Either vanity or hoax. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:31, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Delete Hosting information on a minor's "sexiness" is a bad idea for Wikipedia. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:38, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm an Australian and I've never heard of the Miss Sexy Australia awards which suggests that they either don't exist or aren't very widely known. Capitalistroadster 23:22, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete gross nn vanity. --Etacar11 23:43, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. "People with a crush on someone should not be allowed to edit articles". I'd swear there's a policy about this somewhere. . . . . . Soundguy99 14:21, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.