Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanja Nikolić
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:29, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sanja Nikolić
A stub about someone who fainted on TV. That's it. Since when is everything on Youtube automatcally encyclopedic? Pointless. R. fiend 21:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No real notability established. --Tainter 21:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- keep and due rewrite She is clearly more notable than some of these other people on the list, but article is horribly written.--Sefringle 03:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 12:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with list of Internet phenomena and cite sources such as when the incident took place.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 16:00, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. She appears to be one of minor announcers on a (locally major) television; she's not even listed on their own list of "TV faces", i.e. major journalists. Her sole claim to notability is the accident with fainting, and almost all of (~234) Ghits (for "Sanja Nikolić" Pink) I see refer only to the accident. This article is actually an offshoot of List of Internet phenomena, and it used to be listed there; it should be treated in such context (i.e. cruft); Merge there is also an option.
And, btw, the images are falsely claimed as PD-self; they're schreenshots, i.e. fair use at best. Duja► 16:06, 14 March 2007 (UTC) - Delete fails WP:BIO. --MaNeMeBasat 05:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. In a week nobody's rewritten this. Absolutely does not meet WP:BIO. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to proper recreation (if possible). This person may or may not meet WP:BIO. I am inclined to think that she doesn't because her name gets no mentions in a news search. So perhaps the entire episode is limited to publicity on YouTube. If that is the case, then proper recreation is not possible in any case. -- Black Falcon 22:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
