Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salisbury Manor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 02:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Salisbury Manor

Appears to be a non-notable building. Less than 100 ghits, and many of those that exist seem to be for an apartment building in New York City. Lankiveil 04:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, building is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.[1] Such structures are generally considered notable because this is a peer-reviewed designation. Offline sources surely exist. -- Dhartung | Talk 05:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable enough to keep based on being in NRHP. --Seattle Skier (talk) 06:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. A National Register designation makes it pretty much automatic for me. Realkyhick 06:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Satisfies WP:NN. --KZ ^{Talk • Vandal • Contrib} 10:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Registered historic landmark. --Oakshade 21:41, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. If the State Historic Preservation Officer found the building notable enough to nominate it for the National Register, and the National Register approved it, then it's notable enough for Wikipedia. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 16:11, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.