Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saber's Beads (2nd nomination)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-08 22:00Z
[edit] Saber's Beads (2nd nomination)
Delete per previous afd [1] Nardman1 10:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
I should add, vanity term by Mr. Saber (who is the article's author and has added two vanity links to the article), only 37 Google hits, and so-called "sources" are not peer-reviewed, they're just places he convinced to add some text about his neologism. Nardman1 11:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The evidence just keeps rolling in. Look at what he posted on my talk page. [2] Nardman1 11:23, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- weak keep article is sourced, not identical to former afd --Robdurbar 11:01, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Does it bother you it's vanity by Mr. Saber, including two links to articles about himself and not the so-called phenomenon? Nardman1 11:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Patent vanity. If it is notable, someone else will write it up. -- RHaworth 11:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete vanity Tuvok ^ Talk | Desk | Contribs 12:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Vanity, self-promotion, citing own website, neologism. Claimed recently discovered, but if the effect discussed is real, it is likely to have another name as lunar observation has occurred for hundreds of years. --Dual Freq 16:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, Transfer to wikitionary, or Redirect to other moon-related topics, per WP:NOT#DICT. A good scientific term but no need to list independently. Wooyi 19:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- This discussion has been added as a test case to the proposed guideline Wikipedia:Notability (science). ~ trialsanderrors 06:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
