Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SOFTBLOW

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:34, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SOFTBLOW

Possibly vanity page. Non-notable? Alex.tan 01:52, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Notable. — BRIAN0918 • 2005-08-15 02:35
• Delete. Journal editor might be notable (except that WP article is copyvio). The journal probably isn't. --Alan Au 02:37, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. www.softblow.com doesn't have an Alexa ranking. --Alan Au 02:43, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 03:53, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak Keep Current content is poor, but it exists; it publishes poetry; why not? Dottore So 04:05, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No Alexa ranking leads me to believe that this site and the associated journal are not notable. If someone comes up with a good, thorough citation of it in a more notable publication, I'll change my vote. Fernando Rizo T/C 05:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Alexa. WP:NOT a webguide. Radiant_>|< 13:35, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete NN - brenneman^(t)(c) 15:18, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete the content is not about the title, and the title is about a nn journal. -Splash 18:56, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.