Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SMITH programming language

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:16, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SMITH programming language

This article was part of the mass AfD of "Esoteric Programming languages" overturned by DRV here. It is being relisted for individual consideration. All these languages will be relisted, at five/day to prevent congestion. This is a procedural nomination, so I abstain. Xoloz 04:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, non-notable programming language. JIP | Talk 07:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as the language itself is merely a one-off thought experiment, but I think this is perhaps worth a brief mention in Turing completeness to further illustrate the variety of possible Turing-complete languages. flowersofnight (talk) 17:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • No! Please do not add useless trivia/cruft to genuinly encyclopedic articles. There are dozens of Turing-complete esoteric langauges in existence. —Ruud 21:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per my rationale at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esoteric programming languages. —Ruud 21:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.