Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryugaku

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryugaku

Straight Japanese to english translation, does not appear to have much content besides this. Delete. Fightindaman 01:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• "entering the English vocabulary"? Gee, doesn't that mean neologism? Delete.--み使い Mitsukai 04:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mitsukai; non-notable neologism, admitted as such in article, and unable to verify widespread usage. Note: also see AfD for Oyako Ryugaku. --Kinu ^t/_c 07:56, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a dictionary (particularly for foreign languages) or a slang or usage guide. Also I agree with Mitsukai, if it's "entering the English language", it's a neologism. JIP | Talk 10:54, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as no evidence presented of English usage currency Just zis Guy you know? 14:05, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Move to Wictionary--Tone 14:39, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I doubt they want this on Wiktionary. —Cleared as filed. 15:31, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unencyclopedic translation. -- Krash (Talk) 22:18, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki to wiktionary, along with Oyako Ryugaku and OYAKO 132.205.45.110 22:57, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, it's got no currency to speak of so Wiktionary won't be interested. Stifle 13:48, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.