Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Moore (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel ^§ 00:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ryan Moore (actor)

Non-notable. Vanity page bio authored by the article subject. Delete I@n ≡ talk 05:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep.. and tell users to stop getting involved in stuff they dont know anything about Um guys... I shot my part over 2 days the other day... It hasnt been added to IMDb it takes a long time for most projects... If you give me your emails I can be happy to send you details of the film including set stills... Ryan Moore 08:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • It's nothing against you Ryan, but Wikipedia doesn't cover everything. How about posting the stills to myspace if you haven't already? Choalbaton 18:42, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• I dont have a myspace. I deleted it. If you need any info then I can email it to you. Meh fuck it I give up. People on here just wont learn. Ryan Moore 22:14, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete couldn't even find on IMDb... which is unheard of for new Western actors. If he is to be found there make this vote a neutral because I'd have to research more to decide. gren グレン 05:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- I@n ≡ talk 05:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete lacks notable content, author admits "small" role in unheard of film --Ajdz 06:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Userfy and delete, nn -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 06:41, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment -*Also, Id appreciate if you guys had messaged me first before decieding to begin your little protest. Isnt it better to know the facts first? Ryan Moore 08:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

I for one would appreciate it if you would refer to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically WP:BIO & Wikipedia:autobiography. PJM 19:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment -*I cant believe Im not getting even a withdrawl. This will be fought for a long time Ryan Moore 09:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Just another 14-year-old kid's vanity page. Yeu Ninje 10:35, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete (or userfy, but his user page already contains basically the same information). Applicable policies: WP:V. See also WP:VAIN. — Haeleth Talk 11:38, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment -*I will say it one more time. I can provide proof. I will get the forms sent to ytou whatever but start thinking before acting people! You all have no idea what is going on and acting like you do. Before you post another thing then request info off me, I can email it to you. But Im sick your total bullshit calling this vanity. I am appearing CREDITED in a CREDIBLE film. If you all had LISTENED you might have realised that. Now I will even mail whatever is neseccary to the offices of Wikipedia but in the meantime KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH A SITUATION. I look foward to being able to back my info up and proving you all wrong. Cya tommorow. Ryan Moore 11:43, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - One last thing, to Haeleth: shove your policys. I am aware of them and they do not fit this situation. Ryan Moore 11:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- couldn't find anything verifiable. - Longhair 12:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. He may or may not become a notable actor in the future, but at best he's only just shot his first part and this article is premature. Metamagician3000 13:01, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Note to whoever closes this afd: See also disambig page: Ryan Moore -- I@n ≡ talk 13:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete and also delete the article on the related movie. Doomsday (2006 film) is an nn indie film with no credible names attached to it, no web page, and it hasn't even been shot yet. So how, exactly, is it fit for an encyclopedia? -- Kicking222 14:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable at all and has all the signs of a vanity page.--Cini 15:30, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn vanity. --TM 16:34, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable, WP:V is non-negotiable. Deizio 18:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Choalbaton 18:40, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, not verifiable. Ryan, once your movie gets released and recognized on IMDb, it may find a place here.Shijaz 19:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete By the strict rules on notability, this person fails. doktorb | words 19:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per reasons above, WP:BIO. Don't call us, we'll call you. PJM 19:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Userfy per above. Sorry to pile on, could not resist. Don't call us, and on this basis, we're unlikely to call you. Badgerpatrol 23:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 00:52, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - I've appeared (credited) in more notable films than this and you don't see me setting up my own Wikipedia article. Ryan, your lack of civility is not helping your case. When you are a notable actor in a notable film, someone will create an article for you. Your taking such offence at this discussion is one of the reasons why it's not recommended that people create or edit articles about themselves. --Canley 06:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable bio. -Ambuj Saxena (talk) 08:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:AUTO --Cedders 20:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Having a bit part in a low-budget film does not make one notable. If you become notable enough to be the subject of an encyclopedia article, rest assured someone will make one for you. ekedolphin 01:18, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy per WP:UP. Stifle (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. (Would vote 'userfy', but there's not that much to move across.) --Calair 03:09, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the above.--cj | talk 06:45, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.