Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Dollard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus Opabinia regalis 06:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Ryan Dollard
This is a vanity page written by some talentless hack (a trainee production journalist). Rugbyball 21:01, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment uhh...wow, yeah, can we possibly get a nomination that doesn't attack the article's subject? Metros232 21:06, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, just to clarify; hack as in journalist, talentless as in he has no claim to fame other than his love of Guinness. Rugbyball 21:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Or the fact that he's a presenter and reporter on television? That's not a claim to fame? Metros232 21:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- It's only cat stuck up a tree local television, and besides which he obviously wrote it himself. Rugbyball 21:15, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Or the fact that he's a presenter and reporter on television? That's not a claim to fame? Metros232 21:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, just to clarify; hack as in journalist, talentless as in he has no claim to fame other than his love of Guinness. Rugbyball 21:08, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per nomination for Royal Television Society's award for newcomer of the year [1]. I think that shows a decent amount of notability. Metros232 21:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment with the amount of citation needed tags Rugbyball just added to the article, I'm really beginning to wonder about a bad faith nomination. Metros232 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- So what is the source for this information? I'm beginning to think this you are a bad faith editor. Rugbyball 21:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC).
- Comment with the amount of citation needed tags Rugbyball just added to the article, I'm really beginning to wonder about a bad faith nomination. Metros232 21:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - he is a talentless (and vain) hack. Rugbyball 21:24, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I have no intention of intruding into a private war - I just feel that the article asserts and demonstrates adequate notability.--Anthony.bradbury 23:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Metros232 (given that it was Border TV, it was more likely sheep stuck up mountains than cats up trees). Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:33, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Metros 232. Edison 19:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. More or less NN. Come back when you're actually done something significant or won something significant. WMMartin 18:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.