Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runescape scams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedily deleted by Tom harrison as {{db-repost}} material.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  22:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Runescape scams

It was deprodded, then tagged for speedy with the justification that it violated WP:BEANS and had been deleted before, though I can find no evidence of the latter in the deletion log, so I'm bringin it here. I think the original prod tag is good: Wikipedia is not a game guide. This appears to be original research, which violates official policy. Kchase02 T 07:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• This hasn't been deleted before, but WP:NOT a game guide, etc, this is unencyclopaedic. --Rory096 07:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT original research or GameFAQs. BryanG^(talk) 07:21, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research, fails WP:NPOV, fails WP:NOT (indiscriminate),fancruft Just zis Guy you know? 08:56, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as WP:OR. Kevin 10:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this also fails WP:OR. --Coredesat 10:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete maybe usefull, but nonsense and common sense. Matthew Fenton (TALK - CONTRIBS) 12:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete End thsi discussion right now, and protect from creation Proof-RuneScape cheats J.J.Sagnella 15:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.