Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runescape Quests

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 19:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Runescape Quests

This is a game guide, per WP:NOT Also is WP:OR. I vote Delete Hemhem20X6 06:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete, already posted before. already deleted. J.J.Sagnella 06:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment I just didn't know if it qualified for speedy. I thought that if I listed it for Proposed deletion, that the creator would object.

• Speedy delete by criterion G4: Recreation of RuneScape quests and various similarly named articles (log, AfD). --Huon 13:07, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

As a non-admin, I couldn't tell the difference between this version and the one deleted earlier. If it is indeed different, delete: Wikipedia is not a game guide. --Huon 21:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete - after formerly being de-evolved from summary to titles only and then deleted - can't make a worthwhile article that won't be accused of fancruft. Ace of Risk 15:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as re-created content, if I wanted to find out about specific quests in a game, I'd look on game sites, not an encyclopedic site.--Andeh 16:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - repost, and useless fancruft anyway. CaptainVindaloo ^{t c e} 16:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: The new article has nothing in common with the older, AfD'ed one (admins: please check here). Therefore, the new article does not qulify for speedy deletion under CSD:G4. It may still qualify for deletion for other reasons, but please address the article itself rather than the irrelevant prior AfD. I removed the Speedy notice; let's complete the process properly. Owen× ☎ 17:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete gamecruft. Danny Lilithborne 19:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete For the simple fact that it a terrible version of the previous article of the same topic. Its terrible, and I cannot see how the creator could imagine it would last. Get rid of it before it tarnishes the RS name anymore. I was hoping this article would be revived, but not in this way - • The Giant Puffin • 19:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Great game, but unfortunately, gamecruft. Many other specific RuneScape articles have also been deleted. --Nishkid64 21:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Speedy Delete if applicable--Ed^{talk c E} 22:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per WP:NOT an indiscriminate collection of information. The processes required to complete individual quests are neither notable nor offer a real insight into RS. An outline of all quests is already available on the RS knowledgebase (official page) and quest walkthroughs are already on several fansites. There are more than one hundred quests on RS, trying to list each, some or even a handful (the criteria for inclusion would be another hurdle) is a lost cause, replicating what's out there and boring readers rigid. The RS wiki would benefit from this sort of information, I'd suggest contributors interested in listing this kind of material would do well to pay the place a visit and have a look around. QuagmireDog 23:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Poorly written, no important information HopesFall 02:35, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete It has no information, is written poorly, and there aren't supposed to be game guides, anyway. -Amarkov 15:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Wryspy 19:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this, but recreate a different version of the article on the same subject that doesn't mimic a terrible version of a fansite guide. Quests are certainly notable, but this article isn't how it should be. 24.66.94.140 23:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• Having played RuneScape for over two years, I have closely watched the AFD debates of RuneScape-related articles. While some could certainly be de-crufted, such as RuneScape skills, I don't think it is possible to de-cruft an article about RuneScape quests. Unless you find a way to de-cruft this article, I regrettably have to vote delete. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 10:58, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Reads like a fansite guide. Jam01 07:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, it's not even accurate. 202.67.95.17 02:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Short not complete and not needed --Blaze1200 15:57, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.