Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods (third nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn, becuase of different spelling I never saw the 2nd nom. which was only 2 months ago -- Coasttocoast 22:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RuneScape gods (third nomination)

RuneScape gods (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links)

This article is complete fancruft about the fictional gods in RuneScape, no one outside of Runescape can possibly find this useful.-- Coasttocoast 21:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

First nom. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods, second nom. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RuneScape gods (second nomination)

• Keep That is not the right link. The last afd is here, 2 months ago. Two months are way too short a gap to start a new afd. J.J.Sagnella 21:51, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Your reasoning is faulty, as you're assuming what people may or may not find useful. That is not an established policy. Please make nominations based on some kind of policy, not just what you don't like. Mister.Manticore 21:59, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - too short of time between nominations, learn from the mistakes of GNAA. --- RockMFR 22:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. An AfD after only 2 months, over a keep consensus? Over a "no consensus", that might work, but this seems too much like "Let's nominate it repeatedly until we happen to get a group of people who agree". -Amarkov ^babble 22:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.