Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Walton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 04:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Roy Walton

Delete - Notability not established. Mais oui! 22:21, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

• Neutral for now, this Gsearch returns a lot of hits. Some of them are clearly not this subject, but some of the earlier ones are. I could be convinced he satisfies WP:N --Deville (Talk) 01:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, article is really sparse, but there is a large number of g-hits that reference him as a classic magician and innovator. His "contributions" probably warrant an article - a better one, at least. Kuru ^talk 01:32, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep google suggests he is in the top rank of his profession. Sumahoy 03:19, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: google on "Roy Walton" magic gets 500,000 hits, most of which refer to him as a very notable magician ("It’s been said that Roy Walton invented one of the most original card effects of all..."), he seems to have written several books [1] [2]. AnonEMouse 17:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Hmm...no ISBN numbers for those books. Bookfinder shows two entries from L. Davenport, a self-purported "maker and publisher" of magic. Google shows lots of stuff attributed to Roy, but not a single morsel of biographical information, other than he manages a magic shop in Glasgow, Scotland.[3] I'll send them an email inquiry and see if we can dig up anything. -- Robocoder 21:39, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.