Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rough Guide to Bluehorses

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rough Guide to Bluehorses

This is a "guide" to The Bluehorses, a band that seems to me to be notable. But it doesn't really matter, this is all WP:OR and WP:POV and really WP:NOT the kind of thing Wikipedia is for. Contested prod. Delete. Mangojuice^talk 02:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete: this is either commercial, or trash or both--Musaabdulrashid 01:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not a promotional tool. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not really different in principle from something like Why Christina Aguilera is the coolest ever. NawlinWiki 03:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Definitely recognizable as WP:NOT — MrDolomite | Talk 03:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 04:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Could have been copyvio, see [1]. --Dhartung | Talk 05:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete But merge any useful verifiable stuff into the main article before nuking. rootology 06:18, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.