Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome total war clans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete - WP:CSD#G4. Recreation of deleted material.  Netsnipe  ►  18:50, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rome total war clans

Advertising for non-notable "gaming clans". Virtually identical article deleted 8 days ago, AFD notice is here: DarthBinky 18:26, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

About time the importance of online clans is recognised (see artical 7 of the Eu's human rights act). --Viper X 18:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

I sincerely doubt retroactive criminalization has anything to do with online gaming. --Wafulz 19:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

"Article 7 - No punishment without law

1. No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.

2. This article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations."

Not really relevant, is it? Hut 8.5 20:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Gaming clans are almost never notable. Also note that Viper X is pushing the 3RR limits on this and Rome: Total War --Jamoche 18:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - Viper X has also now vandalized my userpage, addition- and based on his behavior, I suspect he is another sockpuppet of user:Mechanismtongs .--DarthBinky 18:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

• I think there is some evidence that Viper X is a sock, as Mechanismtongs has previously quoted EU human rights regulations to support his ideas [1][2]. And if whoever is doing this feels the urge to vandalise my user page for saying this, please don't bother. Hut 8.5 16:14, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Most gaming clans are non-notable, and this is no exception. Not that you can tell from the stub that's there. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 19:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. "Have improved the page and i do NOT expect the template to be added again" was good for a laugh, though. Recury 19:20, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia isn't gaming clans, especially non-notable ones. --Wafulz 19:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete huh @ Viper X?! Danny Lilithborne 19:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Jamoche, though I'm not convinced that any gaming clan is ever notable. Fan-1967 20:17, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually - yeah. I just have an automatic aversion to stating absolutes. --Jamoche 23:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Burnificate till cooked-through and slide it into the wayward burger-bun of gameclanlookatuswe'regreatcruft. There are a thousand-and-one little game sites simply dying to have clan names slapped all over them, WP is not MySpace. QuagmireDog 23:33, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete: G4: reposted content from Rome total war online clans (AfD) --Pak21 08:13, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

This is not the end, this is not even the beginning of the end but this id perhaps the end of the beginning.--88.108.249.200 17:18, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.