Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolley backpack

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD✉ 23:50, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rolley backpack

It's a pretty amusing faux-sociological/psychological study of those who use wheeled backpacks, but sadly, it's not an encyclopedia article. Joyous (talk) 21:31, July 26, 2005 (UTC)

• Ho ho. Delete Leithp 21:41, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
• BJAODN. Got NOR? --Dmcdevit·t 21:51, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Basically an "adjective." Perhaps redirect to backpack. The content is useless and/or POV. Mmmbeer 21:51, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to backpack, and note the existence of these items there, but the sociological musings are pure BS and must go. Meelar (talk) 21:52, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not funny enough for BJAODN in my opinion. Agentsoo 22:05, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
• Ridiculous. Delete. Don't forget to hit the images, too. —Cryptic (talk) 22:20, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete just plain silly. --Etacar11 01:04, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Original research that's actually "research"... humblefool® 02:56, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete not funny enough for BJAODN. JamesBurns 10:00, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
  • Maybe it's just too subtle for you guys... But you have to admit this bit of vandalism is definitely BJAODN-worthy (btw, I am in love with Rolley Backpack Girl). --Dmcdevit·t 20:35, July 27, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.