Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger David Nance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Lawrence v. Texas. No reason to delete history. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-07 06:09Z

[edit] Roger David Nance

Roger David Nance (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not sufficiently independently notable, and while there is some information in this article that is not in Lawrence v. Texas, there's nothing particularly worth having. Delete and then redirect to Lawrence v. Texas. --Nlu (talk) 06:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Lawrence v. Texas He is not notable by himself. TJ Spyke 08:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per Nlu Intinn^Talk! 08:53, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lawrence v. Texas. I am confused, however. Why would you request that it be deleted, then redirected? Why not just redirect immediately? -- Black Falcon 01:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
  • The reason why I think it should be deleted first is that there's nothing worth having right now, content-wise, anyway. A simple redirect unnecessarily preserves the history. --Nlu (talk) 02:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.