Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rocketbusta Radio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly 21:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rocketbusta Radio

Rocketbusta Radio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) –

Page reads like spam. There is no notability. Editor(s) has deleted all instances of speedy delete before. 49erInOregon 12:58, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep - I dont understand your reasoning for deleting this when there are plenty of other things that have no importance what so ever. Not to mention, who are you to say what does and doesnt belong on "Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia." If this isnt allowed on Wikipedia, then nothing should be.

WP:POKEMON is not a valid reason. 49erInOregon 20:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete as per nom: I cannot see any notability --BozMo talk 13:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep For the amount of wrestlers that have been interviewed on it, it is as noteable as any other radio program. JobDDT 05:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment Do you have any info on the number of listeners it has that might be a better argument for keeping it? 49erInOregon 21:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep Well, the show exists, and it has listeners (including myself), so I see no reason to delete it.Brodeur19 16:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

You exist and people listen to you... do you have a wiki entry? 49erInOregon 03:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Comment But he isn't a form of media. And I highly doubt he has held interviews with people of importance. As for your question about listener numbers, I couldn't tell you because I'm not involved with the show. JobDDT 06:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

I don't have a wiki page... guess I'm not as SUPER AWESOME as 49erInOregon. You're being difficult just for the sake of being difficult. Why don't you go to the website and listen to the show until you understand that it's 100% and there's a decent amount of people calling in, sending in e-mails, and ESPECIALLY those in the chat. Do some research before you simply dismiss it because you don't know what you're talking about.Brodeur19 16:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Your argument was "the show exists and people listen to it" as the reason for keeping the article. How is saying that is not a good argument being "Difficult"? I've never heard of the show before and haven't see any statistics on what makes it notable. There are rules that exist on what makes a page notable so maybe you guys should have researched them before throwing up a page thinking it will stick just because it exists. 49erInOregon 17:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete No assertion of notability, no coverage from third party reliable sources that would make this any different to the countless other one man broadcast from a bedroom internet radio shows. One Night In Hackney 19:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Not notable, fancruft. --James Duggan 19:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above Nashville Monkey 22:58, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N. Addhoc 19:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep More notable than Wrestling Vixxxens. Shot and Botched 15:12, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note to Closing Admin Please keep in mind the only people voting keep are people who have created the article and who may be involved with the show itself and 411mania. 49erInOregon 16:28, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.