Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Knight (principal)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus, so kept. I've added a {{merge}} tag to the article as most of the non-delete votes suggested a merge and/or redirect. JYolkowski // talk 22:57, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Robert Knight (principal)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:17, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Non-notable school principal. We have to let every school in the world in, do we have to allow their faculty? The last paragraph is an attack, anyway, and it was initially created by the original author, so it isn't vandalism of the article. Zoe 04:59, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Not notable, attack page. android79 05:01, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Nateji77 07:11, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Agamemnon2 09:43, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

What changes need to be made to remove the article from the deletion list? I created it, and just removed the aforemented material - which while being quite accurate - is deemed inappropriate by others. The article should stay. For some, places and people they don't know about are not relevant, but for those that know of them - are quite relevant. - G 10:44, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

• You just have to wait for the process to end in 5 days, then for an administrator to close the debate. I find my dinner lady quite relevant, but she's done nothing that would warrant inclusion in an encyclopedia. The whole point is that we can't have an article on every person on earth. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:24, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

• Alf says take a deep breath folks...Merge with what isn't already on Glenunga International High School, G, would you happen to have a connection with the school, the article could stand more work, when was it built, what's the architecture like?. Alf 11:43, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge whatever useful as per Alf.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 12:02, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or merge (making it doubly clear so my vote isn't discounted by any closer trying to be disruptive). Ambi 13:39, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator.--nixie 13:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Glenunga International High School --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:16, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tonywalton  | Talk 15:37, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn. Dottore So 17:03, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nominator. Already documented in the Glenunga International High School article as a school principal. Hall Monitor 19:44, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete redirect if you really must have it. DJ Clayworth 21:39, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, any relevant info already in school article, which as suggested above could do with some expansion--AYArktos 21:41, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
• redirect to the school article doesnt policy dictate we should do that Yuckfoo 06:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
  • What policy? If you're referring to GFDL concerns with a merge/redirect, no merge was performed – dissimilar text was independently added to Robert Knight (principal) and Glenunga International High School, and as such, no redirect is required. android79 13:37, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to Glenunga International High School There can only be one Robert Knight Anyway. :) Roodog2k 18:09, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.