Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rivera's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rivera's Law

^{[Check Google hits]}. NN by any standards. Has the air of legitimacy and good faith, but cannot be included due to WP:RS. (|-- UlTiMuS 02:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non-notable. Unverified. eaolson 03:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no sources. Also seems like a possible WP:HOAX violation: this article about "Rivera's Law" found on google implements more bans on American travel to Cuba. Is it just a coincidence that this article about "Rivera's Law" is about Communism? --Daniel Olsen 03:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Even if its claims are true it's non-notable, but 5 unique Google hits for "rivera's law" indicate that it's not even used on message boards with any semblance of frequency. -Elmer Clark 04:16, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above, no WP:RS to satisfy WP:V. Suspected WP:BALLS. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Heimstern Läufer 08:14, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Even with citations, it is only worthy of a footnote in Godwin's Law. --Dennette 10:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Origin of 'Rivera's law' - http://www.gamingforums.com/showpost.php?p=3171368&postcount=21 . I felt that I had a duty to inform you of this seeing as I am registered both here and at the origin of this WP:HOAX. Blacksilkandy 11:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.