Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/River journey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was It was redirected and is now listed at RfD. Redwolf24 23:50, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] River journey

Article content is identical to Itrw. Delete. Ken ^{talk|contribs} 04:55, August 13, 2005 (UTC)

• I've redirected it to the identical page as it's the English spelling for it. It probably needs merging elsewhere anyway. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:40, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Considering the generic article name, is redirection appropriate? Zoe 19:01, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
    • I actually thought about that. The answer I came up with was the same as yours, otherwise I'd have probably redirected it.
• Delete. Same story as with the other articles by the same author, they are obviously made to prove some point, and are not suitable for Wikipedia. -- Egil 23:04, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.