Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Mannerings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 07:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Mannerings

Delete as a non-notable player. His name shows up in google mostly preceeded by "subs not used:" Gay Cdn 00:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete Seems like a fan is going through the squad of Maidstone United F.C. and making pages for the players. It seems like he's not a first team player on a team that's never even been in the Premiership, which doesn't sound particularly notable to me. If it were a proper article I might vote keep, but unsourced, with no explanation and no care put in, I'm not inclined to give the benefit of the doubt.
• delete as per nom. Pete.Hurd 02:58, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO Alphachimp ^talk 05:23, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rob 10:48, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete 16 year old who has never played professionally. Oldelpaso 17:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 00:07, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. He needs at least one professional game before we can consider him, per WP:BIO. Grandmasterka 05:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 02:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - he is on the books of a non-league team, for whom he has never even played a match. I think I'm more notable than he is..... :-) ChrisTheDude 14:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.