Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revive (Steadman album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 13:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Revive (Steadman album)

Album that did not chart. De-prodded. All the information in this article can already be found in Steadman. Catchpole 16:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, redundant. Parent article contains all this and more. Deizio talk 21:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Steadman. The nature of the Steadman article renders this one pretty much useless, and I don't see any real reason to split the content out of that article yet; however, I think it is reasonable to have this as a redirect to that content. GassyGuy 21:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Of course it didn't chart, it was a Creative Commons release. Strong keep, to keep the consistency of the Steadman discography and because the general practice is that albums get articles. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:00, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
  • According to their article they only released the album on Creative Commons in 2005, presumably after they were dropped by Elektra. Catchpole 11:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Interesting. I wish more bands did that. Regardless, my recommendation still stands due to prior practice and discography consistency. --badlydrawnjeff talk 11:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as a standalone. If anything, the dupliacte info should be removed from the parent article. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 15:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.