Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reporo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I'd have speedied this per WP:CSD#A7. Sorry, clearly fails WP:N. Sandstein 19:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reporo

Reporo (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:ReporoApplication.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Image:ReporoLogo.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

Advertisement, no independent indication of notability. Note that article was created recently by someone with only one previous edit (in mid-2005), and has also been edited by Nicolasb71, whose only edits have been spam edits to include the Reporo product (Either he's associated with the company, or wants to give that impression). In the event that the article is *not* chosen for deletion, it still needs most content removed, as it is ad material that appears elsewhere on the net. Fourohfour 13:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as spam. In fact this could borderline qualify for speedy. EliminatorJR ^Talk 14:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: You may be right if Reporo's Alexa pagerank is any indication- it's at circa 440,000. Fourohfour 14:43, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: I'm sorry if my language and style of writing was wrong for wikipedia, i should have read the WP Policy first, forgive this is my first article creatation and was ovally eager to get something down. i have re-written this from scratch more or less. also i don't have any thing to do with Reporo, i do however use use the service. i was searching around random topics on wikipedia and noticed it didn't have a page....hence this mess now... please comment on the rewrite, if any changes are needed. i'd like to put some more technical background stuff into it but am have hard time finding any information. Tom roffe 11:33, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.