Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renato M. E. Sabbatini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. — JIP | Talk 06:35, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Renato M. E. Sabbatini

Certainly a nice fellow, but this article is largely autobiographical. I'm surprised it has not been nominated before. As a matter of form, I support the notion that substantially autobiographical articles need community consensus to remain. Xoloz 04:55, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Strong keep. 20 or so articles link to it. Astrokey44 11:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Article makes clear claims of notability, and Google returns nearly 14K non-WP hits for "Renato ME Sabbatini". Keep. DS 13:31, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep for reasons above --MacRusgail 13:39, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as number of Wikipedia links and Google hits indicate notability within field. Article seems in reasonable shape at the moment. Capitalistroadster 06:01, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Well, not many other people support that notion, Xoloz. Keep ··gracefool |☺ 17:51, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Yes, this is vanity/autobiographical. However it should be noted that the subject is notable and also that the editor makes good edits to many sarticles. While I am opposed to autobiography on practical grounds, that is not sufficient reason to delete this article. -Willmcw 20:14, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep as per the reasons provided above. Hall Monitor 23:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.