Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion saver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 02:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Religion saver

Religion saver (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism with no refs or notability, plus by the logic stated, any frustration-saving tool would qualify. Pjbflynn 01:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - neologism, dictionary-esque. --Action Jackson IV 02:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Nomen Nescio^{Gnothi seauton} 02:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - appears to be a simple neologism, or at best, a non-notable regionalism. --Haemo 02:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. This is a 'stretch' to be sure. Even if supportable as a term, shouldn't be in WP, but Wiktionary or somewhere else. Shenme 03:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteBalloonman 05:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Irrelevant neologism. - Denny 18:02, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. The Ghits on the subject seem mostly to be Wikipedia mirrors. I'd propose a transwiki if even 1 source was given to show that it's a real word. -- Black Falcon 19:48, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.