Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relative Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Deathphoenix 03:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Relative Time

Delete. This brief explanation of the theory of relativity falls somewhat short of encyclopedic. We could merge to Relativity but better to delete, I think. Lockley 06:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete this garbage. Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 06:21, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. There's nothing here worth merging. Vslashg 06:33, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Relativity. No point in merging. -Ikkyu2 06:34, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• And the time is near to Delete this. Nothing here worth merging. Redirect is good. Rewrite (if it must be merged) is good too. Jawz 06:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Relativity. - Ø tVaughn05 ^talk_contribs
• Delete as well-intentioned but useless and inaccurate.Ben Kidwell 16:40, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. As this is not what time dilation in relativity is, please do not merge. I don't think that a redirect would be helpful, since it seems to me that a reader wanting to look up something on relativity would most likely use "relativity" as the search term. Doctor Whom 22:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete bad bad article, relatively speaking. Ruby 04:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.