Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real Dayton BDSM Support Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Deletion review nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. DS 20:11, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Real Dayton BDSM Support Group

This was initially speedy-deleted. The speedy-deletion is currently under discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion#October 15. In the meantime, one of the authors re-created the article. It probably did not fit the deliberately narrow cases for a CSD but there are serious concerns about the notability of this group and the inherent lack of verifiability. I can find no independent evidence that a group by this specific name exists (see for example [1]), though a prior version of the article did include a link to this site which has a similar name. As a side note, that site is either new enough or small enough that it does not even have an alexa listing. Rossami (talk) 06:31, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete -- Spinboy 06:35, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• This does Not qualify for a speedy delete, but unless additional evidecne of notability and additional encyclopedic content is provided delete as non-notable and as a stub with no potential. DES ^(talk) 06:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Certainly not a speedy. Of course, certainly not a keep either. Delete as non notable and difficult to easily verify. Lord Bob 07:43, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this is at the least the THIRD time this article has been put back after being deleted.Gator1 13:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Definitely not a speedy, however. Non-notable. Xoloz 16:08, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless some reliable sources are provided to verify that this is more than a very small group with limited influence. --Allen3 ^talk 16:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, unverifiable. android79 19:34, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Allen3. (One wonders what happened to the Fake Dayton BDSM Support Group.) MCB 04:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Weak delete. Sounds like a notable BDSM support group, but the current contents are useless. If someone rewrites this I might change my vote. — JIP | Talk 10:31, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - not encyclopedic, not notable - Tεxτurε 14:51, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, though not a speedy. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:07, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 17:08, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. nn. mikka (t) 19:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.