Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reaganomics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speed Keep per obviously. Rob 16:53, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reaganomics

Delete because no pertinence in short article--neither Mrs. Carney or Elton John have anything to do with Reaganomics. Alethiophile 15:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep bad faith nomination. The user Alethiophile vandalized the article to include the text mentioned in the nomination. Vandalism has been reverted and user warned. Gwernol 15:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It appears that Alethiophile's "vandalism" was accidental - inclusion of an earlier vandal attack - but the AfD nomination is incorrect. The vandalism should have been reverted, not used as an excuse to nominate the article. Gwernol 15:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - This is a very notable and valid topic. --cholmes75 15:41, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• SPEEDY KEEP Vizjim 16:01, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This is a valid encyclopedia topic & must have been nominated in error.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  16:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Good grief. –Abe Dashiell ^(t/c) 16:10, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep per aeropagitica :) Dlohcierekim 16:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. As much as I disagree with the subject, it needs to be included here. -- stubblyhead | ^T/_c 16:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.