Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Razor Gator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 22:47, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Razor Gator

Delete Another ad Bugturd 03:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete — Advertisement Kareeser|^Talk! 03:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep unique product, and claims notable jingo. Ruby 03:30, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment — The Razor Gator has a copyright of 2006 on its website, which (as I don't interpret copyrights well) is rather new. I thought there were lots of disposable razors around... Not disputing the vote, simply pointing that out =) Kareeser|^Talk! 03:40, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• It's common practice to simply put the current year as the copyright on a website. Now something with a copyright of 2001 might indicate the website has not been updated in 5 years... Turnstep 16:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. There may be a worthy article to be written about this product, but this isn't it. --Aaron 03:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. -- Kjkolb 07:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep entirely notable. -- Xizer 12:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

• Comment — I see that Xiser's user page is an ad for the product in question; see User:Xizer

• Delete as I'm not seeing notability here. Turnstep 16:37, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is notable? Not to me. --Thunk 17:01, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Hirudo 22:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Bill 23:16, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spam. Catamorphism 08:59, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.