Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Warren

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per consensus – PeaceNT 08:35, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raymond Warren

Raymond Warren (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Article's speedy deletion has been contested by article's creator, who asserts notability. Procedural nomination; no vote — mholland 16:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete This article is not notable in any way and should be deleted from Wikipedia. Tellyaddict 16:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- Pete.Hurd 16:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Listed in the Grove Dictionary; good enough for me as to notability. Geoffrey Spear 19:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - I agree that a Grove listing is sufficient. -- Bpmullins | Talk 20:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Easily sufficient, WP:NOT#PAPER —siroχo 11:44, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

FYI, WP:NOT#PAPER is irrelevant to this discussion. The question would be, rather, if the article meets Wikipedia:Notability (music) guidelines and has sufficient external references. Just clarifying which guidelines are coming into play here. Dugwiki 21:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

• Of course, sorry for the confusion. What I'm saying is that if he is included in a respected paper encyclopedia, it is sufficient, as wikipedia is not paper. I should ahve been more clear. —siroχo 08:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

• keep Grove listing is indeed sufficient, especially when it has a bibliography with two titles attached to it (that means it has even more independant sources) Mgm|^(talk) 12:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Grove listing is sufficient. JoshHolloway 17:40, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
• keep Glad I didn't have to do the work this time. But, a/c the history, after he was nominated for speedy, the Grove's listings were added by 2 different eds.,, and he was then renominated for speedy by the same ed. DGG 06:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.