Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raincrowd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:31, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Raincrowd

Vanity page for what seems like a non-notable band. Cheekily, they've also linked to the wikipedia article from their Official Site in place of biography. IslaySolomon 03:33, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The link from the website is suspicious. Weak Delete since I'm not entirely sure if being an opening act for a couple of notable bands creates notability. But as it appears now, it looks like it fails WP:MUSIC. Yanksox 03:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete per above. I see no substantive assertion of notability. AdamBiswanger1 03:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete is saying they opened for notable bands an assertion or notability? If not I would even say speedy delete --Pboyd04 03:55, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I think it possibly could be, but it depends on numerous factors like the venue. Yanksox 04:17, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete fail WP:MUSIC, non notable and no album releases on major labels. SM247^{My Talk} 04:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Article requires at least a claim to notability with the criteria set out in WP:Music. Three self-produced indie albums on local release doesn't cut it.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  04:41, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC.--Tdxiang 07:02, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 07:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.