Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ragnarok Wrestling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 00:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ragnarok Wrestling

Note: This nomination was first made on Dec. 30 but an error kept it from being transcluded onto the page. It has been transcluded to Dec. 31 instead.

This nomination also includes Mitch Brown (wrestler).

This is an independent circuit for wrestling; it was started in 2004 by "the Brown family and friends". Mention is made of the fact that it has "virtually no money" and "an entire roster of wrestlers under the age of eighteen" -- which, personally, makes me wonder how "the winner [of the annual Hardcore Battle Royal, I think] will become number one contender for the United States Championship." In short, I think these guys are working hard, and having a good time doing what they're doing, and they might just end up famous someday -- but that day isn't today, and until that day, there's not enough notability here for Wikipedia. Sorry, guys. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per own nom. In the My Money Is Not Only Where My Mouth Is, It Got There First department, I have a friend who wrestles for an independent fed which, to be honest, sounds larger and more notable than this one. I haven't tried to make pages for him or even for the fed. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:39, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete -- Backyard wrestling is too fringe for any such "federation" to qualify as notable. Haikupoet 05:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable as above -max rspct leave a message 21:39, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete both. Completely NN. - Liontamer 22:15, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.