Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racism by proxy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete. Mo0[talk] 06:34, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Racism by proxy

This is one of a number of article started by a user with a history of neo-Nazi POV edits.

• Reason for deletion: Non-notable. Fails "Google test" with only 250 results, which anyway give conflicting definition. I found no schollarship of any note on the topic. Charlotte Hobbs 15:09, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Charlotte Hobbs 15:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Sounds like an invention. JFW | T@lk 17:12, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - well, I've used this one, and its really a good way to describe racism. After all, nobody ever admits to being racist, do they? You don't go around the street screaming out "Yay, I'm racist and proud!". Nobody does. KKK don't think they are racist. Neo-Nazis don't either. Even Pauline Hanson doesn't think she's racist. This is a very good way of describing racism. At a bare minimum, Merge with Racism. Zordrac 23:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
• That's as may be, but the question is, is it notable. Charlotte Hobbs 01:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 02:19, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Adjusted Google search (removing Wikipedia and mirrors) yields 155 hits, mostly blogs. Not-notable. Turnstep 02:20, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.