Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RCAF Station Downsview

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merged and redirect. Mailer Diablo 17:40, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RCAF Station Downsview

Improperly formatted AfD. Fixing. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Article lacks much notable content. And I'm being nice to you by using AfD; most cases it would be CSD. --Alicia Lindgren 01:11, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep, lack of content is not sufficent to delete and airports are notable. There are mulitple stub airports and former airports not up for deleteion. At worst I would say merge to CFB Downsview or combined merge of both to Toronto/Downsview Airport. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into appropriate pages Hobbeslover 02:50, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

I've boldly redirected to CFB Downsview, which is a marginally better article. Feel free to revert if you really want the article deleted. Kevin 03:11, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep as a redirect. --Cheapestcostavoider 03:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into relavant page. --Terence Ong 11:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep if merged Aspern 21:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Cambridge. ILovePlankton ^{( L)} 23:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

• It's already redirected, but the target article needs much work to be kept. B.Wind 15:41, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep This place does seem notable, the article is sadly lacking in content, but many great articles started that way. HighInBC 16:22, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.