Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quebec Separatism in the 20th Century

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was redir to History of the Quebec sovereignty movement. -- ( drini's _vandalproof page ☎ ) 04:13, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Quebec Separatism in the 20th Century

I've nominated this for deletion because it seems to be nothing more than a copy-paste (potentially translated from French, as its rather awkwardly written) of what is more or less an editorial. It also goes into the history of the Quebec conflict somewhat, but I imagine there are far better Wikipedia entries on the topic already.Devotchka 21:49, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and cleanup; real phenomenon. ♥♥purplefeltangel♥♥ 01:41, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
  • We know it's real; that isn't the issue. Devotchka 03:34, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to History of the Quebec sovereignty movement, there isn't much worth merging. - SimonP 02:40, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per SimonP. -- Spinboy 02:43, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per SimonP. This feels like Original Research and POV, which I'm tagging it with.--CastAStone 02:45, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect This is pretty obviously a copy-paste. CJCurrie 02:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete unless someone thinks there's something worth merging (I don't), since this doesn't look like it would be a useful redirect. —Cryptic (talk) 02:59, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Cryptic. Agreed this isn't a useful redirect. 23skidoo 03:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no merge or redirect. There are several articles that cover this better and it is not a likely search term. -- Kjkolb 03:35, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, as per SimonP, or merge relevant elements (into) 'HotQsM'. Given 'QSit20th'’s 'awkwardness,' it may contain some germane francophone-perspective information or sources (if cited) that may be worth salvaging and editing severely. E Pluribus Anthony 04:59, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per SimonP. If there's anything to be merged, go ahead and do it. --Jacquelyn Marie 05:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This is almost certainly an essay for some class of a Marianopolis (pre-college) student. Nothing worth merging here. Dottore So 09:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per SimonP --MacRusgail 20:11, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. --Optichan 20:33, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect if it's going to be kept it needs to be completely re-organized.--Newyorktimescrossword 23:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect and merge what's relevant, as above. Radagast 18:22, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• POV/original research; topic is already much better covered in other articles. Redirect as proposed. Bearcat 23:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Can I just redirect it now, or do we need to get an OK from admin since it's in the AfD list? Devotchka 00:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Personally I'd let the debate run its course, given that it's not yet an overwhelming consensus to redirect rather than deleting. Bearcat 00:15, 28 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.