Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quazer Beast
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted. -- ( drini ☎ ) 22:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Quazer Beast
This seems a perfectly normal article, and I hesitate to disturb its existence. However, I fear that it might be a hoax, as it contains no references, and Google turns up no hits other than Wikipedia and its mirrors. Mackensen (talk) 18:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- No verifiability = delete -- ( drini ☎ ) 18:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Good find... unless some verification can be found, and none seems apparent, this is probably a hoax. --W.marsh 18:42, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep I googled it and found: http://today.answers.com/topic/quazer-beast Whoever wrote this article plagiarized Answers.com, but didn't make this up.--Dakart 18:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - No. This is not a case of plagiarism. The link that you have provided at Anwers.com is a copy of the wikipedia article and not the other way round. - Aksi_great (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Oops... I feel stupid now. Thanks for pointing that out. --Dakart 19:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - No. This is not a case of plagiarism. The link that you have provided at Anwers.com is a copy of the wikipedia article and not the other way round. - Aksi_great (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as either original research or hoax. --Zoz (t) 18:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Almost certainly a hoax. Only 8 unique G-hits, and pretty much all of them are WP and mirrors (note: I just realized the nomination already said this). Well, if it can't be verified, it's deleted, pure and simple. -- Kicking222 19:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Original research or a hoax. --Quintin3265 20:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Gerard Foley 21:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.