Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum aesthetics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --JoanneB 20:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quantum aesthetics

136 matches on Google. Sentences like, "Quantum physicists these days often rely on the poetry and fiction to illustrate the subatomic nature of the universe". Reads badly aswell as un-sourced. Rex the first ^{talk | contribs} 00:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:OR, WP:V, and possibly also WP:NEO--TBCTaLk?!? 02:52, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NOR, WP:NEO, and WP:V. Essays don't belong on Wikipedia. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:28, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete essays are verboten. SM247^{My Talk} 03:34, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 07:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Comment: the theory exists, see e.g. [1], so it's potentially verifiable and so forth. Notability remains a concern, as does the fact that this is an essay not an article. — Haeleth Talk 13:06, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NN. Zos 18:54, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It is a review of a book called El Cadaver de Balzac: Una visión cuántica de la Literatura y el Arte (which I would guess means something like Balzac's Corpse: A quantum vision of literature and art). The article is also a copyright violation from [2]. Jll 21:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Possible original research or copyright violation. --Tachyon01 23:17, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete. This is so amazing. The article talks about the writer, the other writer, another writer, effects, affects, politics, ... but nothing concrete about "Quantum aesthetics". It's pure gush, and likely copyvio and OR at the same time. Shenme 03:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Quantum Delete and also consider supporting the deletion of article Gregorio Morales by the same editor. Pascal.Tesson 03:51, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete BJOTD maybe (but definitely not funny). LotLE×talk 07:14, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 12:27, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above Computerjoe's talk 12:36, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. - Tapir Terrific 22:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.