Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadrenium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 02:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quadrenium

Article is a dictionary definition (WP:WINAD), and is mis-spelt (should be 'quadrennium', see American Heritage Dictionary]). BrownHairedGirl 01:54, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom, WP:WINAD. Esquizombi 01:56, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not much use for a misspelled dicdef. Fan1967 01:59, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone --djrobgordon 02:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 02:50, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above --Khoikhoi 03:06, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Maxamegalon2000 03:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete d/t misspelling. Alba 04:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Bucketsofg 05:43, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Very little potential even for a correctly spelled version to be more than a dicdef. — TKD::Talk 07:19, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per everyone else. JIP | Talk 08:05, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, as per everyone else. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, by golly. ProhibitOnions 10:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Incase somebody uses this term for political time spans.

--Masssiveego 05:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Quadrenium_1cb1.html"