Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punctuality

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No conensus. Redwolf24 01:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Punctuality

Poorly written, unformatted article on a dicdef topic. -Satori 19:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --BradBeattie 20:35, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV essay. Not even a dicdef. ManoaChild 21:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NOT a dictionary, but even a dictionary wouldn't take this.-Splash 22:03, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• keep, notable topic in school discipline, military organization, labor relations, and life management. Vfd is not cleanup. Kappa 22:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Once cleaned, and by god it needs more than just the spaces at the start removing, it will, I'll hazard be noting more than a dicdef and WP:NOT a dictionary. -Splash 22:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep valid cultral topic, VfD isn't for bad articles on noteworthy subjects. --zippedmartin 23:58, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and improve. Trollderella 01:35, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• VFD can be for bad articles on notable subjects, but I think this can be cleaned up. Let's give it a chance it's barely a day old. If it's cleaned after a considerable amount of time I may vote delete, but not now. It is indeed a valid subject. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:11, August 17, 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.