Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulier's Law

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 07:48, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Pulier's Law

Non-notable vanity page. Google turns up 642 for Eric Pulier and no results for Pulier's Law. — ceejayoz ^★ 18:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz ^★ 18:37, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete because of Isotope's Law: You have to do more than spout some silly sayings to be notable.--Isotope23 18:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, but I strongly advocate an article for Isotope's Law ;-) Justin Bacon 01:32, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • Now that's a law I can support. *g* — ceejayoz ^★ 03:11, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Sadly, although he mentions 'other "eponymous laws"', he fails to state what "Pulier's Law" might actually be. The world is the worse off for it, no doubt. Eaglizard 15:44, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
  • He did manage to slip it into List of eponymous laws here... — ceejayoz ^★ 16:45, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.