Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psychatog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Odyssey (Magic: The Gathering). Angr/talk 12:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Psychatog

Single Magic: The Gathering card. Single cards aren't notable enough for Wikipedia (though the most famous nine cards from Magic are notable enough for their own single page).

• Delete per above. -- Grev 05:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete/Merge Either delete it, or merge it into another article for MTG cards. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Vercalos (talk • contribs).
• Delete/merge per above user. Deckiller 05:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, all necessary information is already in Odyssey (Magic: The Gathering) --Cornflake pirate 06:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
  • In which case redirect to the card series. When articles for cards 'notable' enough to be mentioned in the series article have been created in the past, we have redirected to that series. From there, the external link provides all the information on the card required. -- Saberwyn 10:54, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete already in main article, or just redirect.--MONGO 10:55, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Odyssey (Magic: The Gathering); the latter article and its external link do not provide the same depth of coverage. Melchoir 04:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • This article consists of the stats for the card (which I'm pretty sure is copyright to Wizards), a few unsourced claims "(widely recognised as one of the best...", "inspired many..."), and a whole series of external links to what the article's composer think are cool cards to have in the same deck as this. Are we going to copy and rebuild the WOTC online Magic Card database on Wikipedia, diversified out with a little fan speculation and some material coped from copyright articles on the WOTC website? With thousands (close to ten thousand) of cards printed since the game start in 1992, you better start composing those article now. -- Saberwyn 09:17, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and Delete Per above -- Alpha269 16:28, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: This is not a valid vote. A merge must be followed by a redirect, in order to preserve contributor history for the GFDL. Please choose another vote. Stifle 09:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep or merge, looks like an interesting card. Kappa 09:05, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Odyssey (Magic: The Gathering), per precedent on AFD. Stifle 09:43, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.