Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Psi Abilities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Psi Abilities

Non-verifiable original research. There's also no context provided- no statement of who believes these things or why. POV is also rife- the views on religion and spirituality seem to be those of the primary author alone, rather than an attempt to document the beliefs of any notable group or movement. Clay Collier 06:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. -- Clay Collier 06:29, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -Walter Siegmund 07:32, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Highly POV meanderings. Moriori 07:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Patent nonsense --StoatBringer 09:22, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense Logophile 12:30, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Probably author's personal beliefs, which have no place on Wikipedia except for author's user page, definitely original research, POV and soapbox rant. Aecis 16:01, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to parapsychology. This is a very conceivable search term. Meelar (talk) 20:09, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; I'm a fan of redirects, but this one is of questionable value since ESP is at least as likely as parapsychology. Xoloz 12:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
  • I chose parapsychology because psionics redirected there already. Meelar (talk) 21:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete : Psi abilities, setting aside that they don't exist, are construed as not just ESP but also telekinesis, clairvoyance, and astral travel. That's more general than ESP but not as general as parapsychology, which includes things like ghosts, auras and past lives. I think a delete leaves room for someone to create an article at the appropriate level of detail, with links to parapsychology and ESP and whatever else, that would be coherent and have NPOV. TECannon 05:12, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. as per nom --Reflex Reaction 13:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.