Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution in Pakistan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy delete. for reasons below.--Kungfu Adam (talk) 10:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prostitution in Pakistan
The topic has strong potential as per other Prostitution in country X articles (for example for Philippines, Nepal, South Korea or People's Republic of China). But this article is primarily made up of uncited or verified (WP:V) information and statements, I have tried to find sources for this information and have be unable to find direct verification of the information. With the lack of verification and the direct identification of a group of people (Fatima Jinnah Women University students aged 18-25), the content may be original research (WP:NOR) and could questionably be an attempt to attack or disparage. blue520 04:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as A6. As said, the title of the aritcle indicates a legitimate article, but the content has an extremely negative claim against a specific group, without citing sources (and I'm certain no reliable source would back up such an absurd claim). --Rob 04:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, fails CSD-A6, attack page, fails WP:NOR and WP:NPOV miserably. --Coredesat talk 04:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as an attack article (violates A6). If not speedy, then it fails WP:NOR. TedTalk/Contributions 05:13, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think it's really an attack page, and in fact I don't really detect any POV in it. But it is OR and an essay (Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought), and I originally thought it might be a copyvio. If the article can be worked on from scratch with verifiable info, I will consider keeping. Morgan Wick 05:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.