Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Principles of system architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 23:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Principles of system architecture

Either this is original research or an instruction manual, though it has a long history. If it is neither, vote KEEP. If it is, what do we do with it? -- Perfecto 00:26, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:28, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

⇒⇒ It means a lot of work, but I think it can be combined with Technical architecture as a general (Technical) Architecture article (in particular, this is a Systems Architecture article and Technical Architecture is a Software Architecture article). I am sure I can find enough relevant references. I have (privately) saved this article, so if you want to delete until I (or someone else) can get around to doing the edit, it's OK by me. As it stands, it really is not appropriate to Wikipedia, but it has a lot of good content.

• Delete insufficient references/original research (cited within the article!)⇒ _normxxx| ^talk ⇒ email 00:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per original research. Arbustoo 00:48, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete original research/how to. Makemi 01:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per original research and Wikipedia is not an instruction manual. Royal Blue 02:14, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. Blnguyen 02:37, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete those principles are not notable. Fargo3455 03:45, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete per nom. Article could be re-written.,,,,,Ariele 03:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per original research. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete OR. Pavel Vozenilek 00:14, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.