Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Previewseek

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE (when suspected sockpuppet votes are removed. NONE of the Keep vote are from established Wikipedians). JamesTeterenko 16:13, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Previewseek

• Keep The metasearch engine is unique in its technologies and is worthy of attention. Vote by User:217.43.154.52 (forgot to sign)

• Delete. Advertising. Not notable. User User:217.43.154.52 is adding this company all over related articles. --84.48.119.171 08:30, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• No vote. It does look like the author of this article is promoting it too enthusiastically on Wikipedia, but that doesn't mean it isn't worthy of an article.-gadfium 08:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. It hasn't even been public for a month. Let's give it time to establish itself. --Several Times 14:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete until it becomes notable. —thames 18:52, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertising for non-notable company. --Carnildo 22:48, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep qwm 16:19, 18 August 2005
• Keep knk003 16:42, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I agree with Gadfium.
• Keep. sciencejournalist 08:33, 19 August 2005 This is most definitely a notable search engine. It is already becoming the default search engine of choice within the journalist community.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.