Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasara Body-Flow
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Bobet 15:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prasara Body-Flow
Duplicate of the original entry for Prasara, essentially an advertisement for Scott Sonnon coupled with some original research. Dsreyn 16:51, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (thanks to Dsreyn) and for the same reasons as Prasara above. --Mereda 19:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, the article is currently unverified and from what I see on the web, all references to this are related to the creator and/or from his websites. If there were external references to this in other Yoga publications I might be swayed otherwise...--Isotope23 20:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- STRONG Keep. Dr. Sonnon and another famous yoga instructor Kali Ray [1] both apply this prasara method of performing yoga which can be found explained in Patanjali's Yoga Sutras [2]- the bible of hatha yoga. B-ham 21:17, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. From WP:AFD: Please disclose whether you are an article's primary author or if you otherwise have a vested interest in the article. Dsreyn 00:11, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Hornplease 05:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete and then Redirect to Prasara, as an advertisement fork. (I'm not voting on the AfD for Prasara.) — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 17:51, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Prasara now sleeps in the bit bucket. Herostratus 03:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This is more Scott Sonnon spam. His article is at AfD but looks to survive, but that doesn't mean he needs a bunch of spam articles for every technique he developed or named. There are several. It's annoying. Herostratus 03:12, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment. You're annoying and your votes have been proven to be unwarrented by popular vote. Enjoy being outvoted because I'm sure it won't be the last time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by B-ham (talk • contribs) 19:45, September 12, 2006 (UTC)Deleted by User:B-ham, restored to explain WP:NPA comment below. Dsreyn 20:30, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.